Friday, 13 May 2011

wolf blitzer wife

wolf blitzer wife. Guest: Wolf Blitzer
  • Guest: Wolf Blitzer



  • Pro31
    Apr 6, 02:08 PM
    It is because Motorola likes to tote their hardware, where as Apple's software is what kills it.





    wolf blitzer wife. lynn greenfield wife of wolf blitzer
  • lynn greenfield wife of wolf blitzer



  • Bleubird2
    Apr 27, 08:51 AM
    Sleep walking a lot lately?

    Do you have a kid or someone using your phone while you're asleep?





    wolf blitzer wife. lynn greenfield wife of wolf
  • lynn greenfield wife of wolf



  • deadworlds
    Mar 25, 11:58 PM
    I'm really not looking forward to Lion at all. It just seems like a huge step backwards for those of us that use our computers as real computers and not toys. I have an ipad, an iphone and several macs, but they each have specific uses. I don't want my desktop machine to be anything like my ipad, one is for doing real work and doing my daily stuff on, the iOS gadgets are for fun games and browsing mostly.

    I LOATH the whole idea of merging OSX and iOS, they shouldn't even be related. I hate how they are ruining expose, I really don't want my stuff groups by app, I want to see every window like it is now. I have no use for "full screen" apps, why would I waste all my screen real estate only showing one thing at a time? I hate the idea of getting programs through the app store on the Mac, I refuse to do that. I hate all the gesture crap going on, sure it's fine for laptop users, but it's of no use to me on my mac pro.

    I think all this is just a dumbing down of what is an amazing OS. I don't use my mac with dual displays anything like I'd use an iPad, so why put that crap in there? I just don't like the direction they are taking OSX in general, and I doubt I will upgrade from snow leopard. To me this is very sad news, the day OSX and iOS merge is the day the mac dies.

    I 100% agree!





    wolf blitzer wife. lynn wolf and robin glass
  • lynn wolf and robin glass



  • wmmk
    Aug 17, 03:32 PM
    And for what purpose? Would any of you drop the $3500 needed to upgrade to the latest Mac Pro? Or is it just the drool factor, like when you look through Car and Driver and drool over an $80K sports car?
    Some people do things called graphic design and video editing for a living. Sometimes, when you want to make money and put food on the table, you want top of the line equipment.:rolleyes:





    wolf blitzer wife. wolf blitzer burning man.
  • wolf blitzer burning man.



  • Multimedia
    Aug 17, 01:59 PM
    The interesting thing to note from the Anandtech review is that to saturate a 2 core setup, all you need is one program. To saturate a quad, you need to be doing a bit more at the same time. To saturate an octo, you need to be doing a hell of a lot of things at the same time.Not so. I can only run one compression process at a time on the Quad G5 unless I want the speed of that process and others I want to run at the same time to be compromized. Both Toast and Handbrake can use 4 cores EACH.Now I don't know bout you lot, but there's only so much I can do at the same time.This is the place where you are misunderstanding how LITTLE one can do with only 4 cores. Sure it helps to be able to run anything I like and still use FCP with no performance hit. So I think a quad is perfect for that. But when it comes to 8+ cores, your actual workflow won't improve in the slightest unless it doesn't involve you having to do anything (eg run 4 instances of handbrake). I'm sure everyone once in a while has some work that can just be delegated to the CPU and it does its thing, but for the most part, where your attention and brain is needed, an 8 core will sit at least 50% idle.Not from where I'm sitting. The opposite is true for me.Considering Clovertowns will have a slower, twice saturated FSB and lower clock speeds, most people will be better off (financially and productively) with Woodcrests. I'm just hoping that when octos are announced, the quads will drop in price.But speed is not our problem. Apps already capable of saturating 4 cores need more cores to run simultaneously without compromising speed.Now if they start to optimise apps to take full advantage of more than 2 cores, that's a whole different ballgame ;)That is what has already happened. You were unaware of that fact. So yes, it is a whole different ballgame already. :eek:





    wolf blitzer wife. you and Wolf Blitzer in a
  • you and Wolf Blitzer in a



  • AppleScruff1
    Apr 11, 05:46 PM
    Iphone 5 on Sprint?

    Verizon will buy Sprint since AT&T is buying TMobile.





    wolf blitzer wife. with Wolf Blitzer,
  • with Wolf Blitzer,



  • ender1122333
    Apr 5, 08:47 PM
    This could make me very happy.

    Any news on a Logic studio refresh happening any time soon?





    wolf blitzer wife. exchange with Wolf Blitzer
  • exchange with Wolf Blitzer



  • Silentwave
    Aug 17, 10:27 PM
    I'll just wait until the 4GHZ Mac Pro. I wonder what that bad boy can do.:rolleyes:

    I wonder if they'll even bother to go to 4GHz anytime soon. the roadmap is for more cores. We have on the roadmap DP and MP (>2 chips) capable Quad-core chips starting to come out by the end of this year/early next year. The next step is 8+ core chips. The next Xeon is Clovertown, which is just Woodcrest scaled to 4 cores with a few changes in clock and FSB etc. Tigerton comes next, also 4 cores but MP capable (3+ chips possible) and with a possibility of increased FSB speed, bigger L2 cache and so on. Its successor, Dunnington, will be a 45nm chip with between 4 and 32 cores depending on who you believe.





    wolf blitzer wife. wolf blitzer dougie.
  • wolf blitzer dougie.



  • 63dot
    Apr 28, 02:40 PM
    I guess the republicans can maybe now look at the issues.

    I am glad that Obama put out the papers to shut the conspiracy theorists up.

    But there are too many GOPers out there who don't know Hawaii is a state. Hey, isn't Hawaii an Islamic state?

    Though I am liberal, I do know that the Supreme Court is not in agreement as to who can run for president. Back in the day of the founding fathers, there wasn't a real precedent, mostly because until we won the Revolutionary War, we didn't have a country anybody else recognized or took seriously.

    If the GOP wants to take this a step further, they could try and say Obama was born earlier, in Hawaii, before it was a state and get strict constitutionalitists to say the issue then becomes whether a person from a non-state (US Territory) can run.

    Of course, many judges will side on what makes them happy politically. If it took the US Supreme Court until 1973 to define the important concept of due process, how long will they hold out until they define just who can run for president.

    Many supporters of Alexander Hamilton wanted him to run, while some others in his day didn't think he was "eligible".:p





    wolf blitzer wife. Wolf Blitzer interviews
  • Wolf Blitzer interviews



  • Carlson-online
    Jul 20, 11:47 AM
    I remember hearing about how it is possible to make multiple cores act like one (Idon't remember where I heard this). Anyways, whether 8 cores acting separately or together like 1 big processor has an advantage depends on the program you use. If the program is multi-threaded, then the cores acting separately might have the advantage while single threaded apps will have an advantage if the cores are acting like one. However, many apps today won't see that much improvement either way (like a simple calculator, or solitare and word processing).

    yes, its known as reverse hyper threading. AMD are working on it
    http://www.dvhardware.net/article10901.html





    wolf blitzer wife. to newsanchor Wolf Blitzer
  • to newsanchor Wolf Blitzer



  • Tones2
    Apr 19, 03:31 PM
    Chord patterns are indeed part of the genre; however, when you also copy the melody and simply change the title AKA(George Harrison..."Here comes the sun"), then, you get the pants sued off of you.

    I think pretty much all blues songs have the same melody. Only the lyrics change. :)





    wolf blitzer wife. Wolf Blitzer tweeted that
  • Wolf Blitzer tweeted that



  • twoodcc
    Apr 9, 06:48 PM
    good to hear. hopefully apple adopts the new processors soon. the macbook airs really need a processor update





    wolf blitzer wife. Wolf Blitzer On His Beard: quot;I
  • Wolf Blitzer On His Beard: quot;I



  • Full of Win
    Mar 31, 07:19 PM
    Exactly. What we need are more objective, balanced and rational sounding opinions like yours.

    What he said was spot on. Gruber is the archetypical Apple sycophant, second only to Andy Ifatso from MacBreak Weekly.





    wolf blitzer wife. Attempt to wolf blitzer
  • Attempt to wolf blitzer



  • hob
    Apr 5, 05:00 PM
    Genuinely looking forwards to getting my grubby mitts on this one...





    wolf blitzer wife. Wolf Blitzer FAILING on
  • Wolf Blitzer FAILING on



  • kdarling
    Apr 19, 02:43 PM
    That sort of misstates the test for likelihood of confusion. A consumer might, for example, believe that Apple licenses or otherwise blesses the Samsung products. That's probably good enough.

    Thank you for the correction!

    Please stop spreading FUD. If you knew anything about the history of the iPhone, you would know that it was announced and previewed at MacWorld 2007.

    "FUD" is a big strong, don't you think? But you are correct; the F700 was shown off a couple of weeks later.

    As I've said many times, 2006 was the time that everyone of us in the business (not casual consumers) knew that touchscreen phones were coming. Many companies were working on them; some quicker than others. They had no need to copy from each other; there's only a few major ways to do an all-touch phone without getting weird.

    That's why Jobs felt he had to show off the iPhone before the other trade shows came along, long before it was ready for sale. He did not want to be seen as second in line. (It had nothing to do with the FCC... that's a story for the naive.)





    wolf blitzer wife. Wolf Blitzer
  • Wolf Blitzer



  • briand05
    Apr 11, 11:49 AM
    Hopefully it will have LTE. The disappointing thing is the A5 will be outdated by the end of the year/early 2012, if they do in fact use the same processor as in the iPad 2. They better have 1 GB of RAM at least at that point too. If they wait that long I would hope that the iPhone 5 is a pretty big hardware leap.





    wolf blitzer wife. Wolf Blitzer just got a
  • Wolf Blitzer just got a



  • Trekkie
    Sep 14, 05:22 PM
    I got this great response this morning from my IT snob:
    "Where in that linked article does it say 64bit? I see 65 nm, but not 64 bit. Duct taping two 32 bit cores together may get you Mac 64 bit processing... great for drawing cool pictures."

    Anyone have a link that shows that Clovertown is 64 bit? Please help me to defeat this PC IT ogre


    Why not get it from The Horses Mouth (http://www.intel.com/pressroom/kits/core2duo/pdf/intel_multicore_fact_sheet.pdf) over at intel (PDF Warning)

    They specifically state that Clovertown is a multi-core packaging of Woodcrest which is a 64 bit processor.

    Hate it when IT people act like morons and give the rest of us a bad name.





    wolf blitzer wife. CNN#39;s Wolf Blitzer pause
  • CNN#39;s Wolf Blitzer pause



  • epitaphic
    Aug 19, 05:57 PM
    There's allready en new beta of Adobe's Lightroom, Does that one run native under on the intel machines?
    From Adobe's site:

    Will Lightroom run on Intel-based Macintoshes?

    Yes. The Macintosh version of Adobe Lightroom beta 3 is a Universal application that will run natively both on PowerPC systems and on the new Intel-based Macintoshes.





    wolf blitzer wife. wolf blitzer dougie.
  • wolf blitzer dougie.



  • THX1139
    Sep 13, 12:42 PM
    A bit pointless given that no software utilises the extra cores yet. But nice to know, I guess.

    I'm still getting used to having two cores in my laptop!

    Why do people think the computing world always revolves around them? Extra cores WILL be recognized by most 3d applications and will speed up rendering. There are many other applications for multiple core use that don't include web browseing or writing email to your grandma.

    peace





    BoyBach
    Aug 7, 04:27 PM
    I voted for the Enhanced Dashboard. This seems really useful to me - my own personal web clipping service of the things I want to check regularly with the click of the Mighty Mouse Scrollball :)

    I also think 'Spaces' will become invaluable within a few hours of getting used to it.





    iJawn108
    Aug 6, 03:21 PM
    http://www.apple.com/quicktime/qtv/mwsf06/





    OS2toMAC
    Mar 22, 03:55 PM
    With the shortages of iPad2's out there, and international sales about to start up, probably making it worse, if the Xoom, G Tabs and Playbooks are "close enough" (particularly for folks that are not avid Apple followers), they could get quite a few sales. At least that is my opinion. (And like everyone I have an @$$-hole too.):)





    63dot
    Apr 25, 02:21 PM
    Prove it.

    It may be hard to prove and the burden of proof is on the plaintiff, but the mere appearance of the technology allowing the possibility to be tracked is enough for the feds to get something out of Apple.





    milo
    Jul 14, 03:21 PM
    Except Conroes don't support dual processor configuration. Woodcrest does, hence the reason it will be in the Pro line machines while Conroe is put into new iMacs.

    So why use woodcrest WITHOUT dual processor configuration? Makes no sense, any single proc models should be conroe.

    - copying DVDs - you can't legally copy 99% of DVDs anyway, if there was no need for twin CD drives, why would there suddenly be for DVDs?
    - burning two at once - few people need this, and it's a great sales opportunity for a Firewire external burner anyway. Hell, why stop at TWO?
    - Blu-ray - not unless they're really screwed up BR and drives with BR will be incompatible with existing media or something.

    Against this, you have the confusion generated by a Mac with two optical drives. I have a Mac with two optical drives (an in-built combo drive, and a FW DVD burner), and it's not terribly elegant. It's fine when reading disks (obviously), but writing them generates some confusion. How sure am I that I'm burning to the right drive? I'm not saying you can't do it, I'm just saying this would be unbelievably un-Mac like. It'd be like the next version of iTunes coming with a menu at the top of its window.


    Macs have ALREADY had two optical bays (including twin CD drives). And none of these configs include two drives, you'd only have a second one if you wanted it.

    Copying DVD's, nowadays people are backing up their own materials. Most dvd copying would be making backups of your own discs. Burning multiple discs would be a great option as well. And bluray drives will be INCREDIBLY expensive when these machines ship, not to mention who knows how well they will burn cd's and dvd's (assuming that all bluray drives will be burners, none of them readers only). Many people will want to wait and add a bluray or hd-dvd later, especially since nobody knows which will be the winning format.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment